About the Environmental Health Indicators
We monitor New Zealand’s environmental health through a set of Environmental Health Indicators.
Our Environmental Health Indicators programme is funded by the Ministry of Health. It is part of their statutory responsibility to monitor the health of New Zealanders.
On this page
Environmental health indicators describe the link between the environment and health. They are based on known or plausible cause-and-effect relationships between the environment and health.
The indicators provide information for action. They provide key evidence to help decision-makers, and raise awareness of environmental health risks, to improve human health.
The New Zealand environmental health indicators currently cover the following topics:
- air quality
- drinking water
- recreational water
- indoor environment (home heating, household crowding and second-hand smoke)
- UV exposure
- hazardous substances
- climate change
The information will be particularly useful for health officials and public health staff in District Health Boards, local government, and other central government agencies.
Environmental health indicators help identify potential risks to human health, including emerging risks. The indicators can help to guide policy actions, target action and allocate resources.
The key purposes of the New Zealand Environmental Health Indicators are:
- to monitor trends in the state of the environment
- to monitor trends in health outcomes linked to environmental hazards and exposures
- to compare the environmental health status of geographic areas
- to monitor the effectiveness of policies and other interventions on environmental health
- to help raise awareness about environmental health issues
- to help initiate further investigations into links between the environment and health.
Environmental health indicators usually describe one aspect of the environment-health relationship. They can generally be classified into:
- Exposure indicators: possible environmental determinants of health
- Health indicators: possible health effects from environmental hazards and risks
For example, air quality is measured with indicators about the sources of air pollution, air quality monitoring results, and health effects of air pollution.
The indicators don’t take into account the effect of other factors (eg, risk factors such as diet, smoking etc) on health. Usually the available data does not measure an individual's or population's actual exposure to environmental hazards and risks.
The data for indicators are generally sourced from other agencies.
Indicators need to be robust and meaningful. Our indicator selection criteria below are based on Statistics New Zealand’s Good Practice guidelines . The indicators are evaluated by our team and a technical advisory group every six months.
Table 1: Environmental Health Indicator selection criteria
|Indicator selection criteria||Explanation|
|Available data||Indicator must have data that can be easily and reliably extracted.|
|Scientifically valid||Indicator must have an established, scientifically sound link to the environmental health issue.|
|Sensitive||Indicator should respond relatively quickly and noticeably to changes, but not show false movements.|
|Consistent||Indicator should be consistent with those used in other indicator programmes (including internationally), so comparisons can be made.|
|Comparable||Indicator should be consistent to allow comparisons over time.|
|Methodologically sound measurement||Indicator measurement needs to be methodologically sound.|
|Intelligible and easily interpreted||Indicator should be sufficiently simple to be interpreted in practice, and be intuitive in the sense that it is obvious what the indicator is measuring.|
|Able to be disaggregated||Indicator needs to be able to be broken down into population subgroups or areas of particular interest, such as ethnic groups or regional areas.|
|Timely||Data needs to be collected and reported regularly and frequently, to ensure it is reflecting current and not historical trends.|
1. Statistics New Zealand. 2009. Good Practice Guidelines for the Development and Reporting of Indicators. Wellington: New Zealand.